Let me put it bluntly: there isn’t much technical substance to GEO.
You think it’s complicated because those GEO companies want you to think it’s complicated. In reality, the principle is so simple that once I explain it, you can do it yourself.
The principle is just a thin sheet of window paper
So-called GEO means that when users ask questions on AI platforms such as Doubao, Qianwen, Hunyuan, and DeepSeek, the returned answers prioritize recommending the content we planned. That’s all it is.
So how do these domestic large models answer? Right now, they all answer by combining source media. This technology is not some black tech hidden behind large models; everyone can see it.
Take Doubao as an example. It is the AI platform with the largest traffic in China. When you post a question, it first screens sources to use for reference and corroboration. You can see this directly on the front-end page. Most people just don’t notice it: those lines of underlined text below the answer are the sources. Click them, and you’ll see the original text it referenced.
To put the logic plainly, there are just two steps: first, the AI performs semantic-level word segmentation based on your question and locks down the scope of the question—that is, “which dimensions it thinks this question should be analyzed from.” Then it takes those segmented words and searches its source database for related content.
This is the answering logic of all mainstream domestic large-model AI products. When it comes to finding scope and screening, the principle is the same as search engines. There’s nothing mysterious about it.
So it’s very easy to operate
Look at the sources being cited—many are not especially authoritative media. Even authoritative media can be accessed through reasonable channels. This is the LLM generative AI logic that fits our national conditions. The reason is simple: our biggest information sources are grassroots media and official media that can be paid for.
So as long as you want AI to know you and to mention you when users search, and you grab the right sources, you’re more than halfway there.
Why do I say more than halfway? Because GEO is not completely without technical skill.
In terms of judging the truthfulness, originality, authority, and structured data of content, we’ve had this ability since the Baidu era. AI doesn’t reference things 100% blindly; it still makes some distinctions. First screen, then distinguish, then reason—this is the generation principle behind more than 90% of personalized content.
So if you want AI to recommend you, you still have to put some effort into the content. If you write nonsense, others can tell. But these details at most count as editing ability. There is already more copywriting out there than there are dogs on the street; this really isn’t hard. If you’re only competing at the regional enterprise level, you don’t need to be very professional at all. Get the sources right, get the copy on the right track, and you’ll rise. At this stage, doing that much is enough.
Let’s talk about sales conversion effects
The Douyin Store backend can now separately filter transactions from the Doubao channel. This was only connected after July. So the effect can be accounted for; it’s not mysticism.
The data I’ve seen is that in some Douyin verticals, for top merchants’ Douyin Store business, the share of AI-driven transactions has already exceeded 30%, with some reaching 40%. Merchants who only started investing in February this year have now passed 10%. But in the same vertical, many top stores whose names you’d recognize are still below 1%. The gap isn’t in budget; it’s in how early they acted.
There’s also a single case: a merchant did 1,500 yuan of content placement on Doubao, and the GMV counted on the e-commerce side was over 20,000 yuan, with ROI around 1:13.3. The sample is small and can’t be taken as a general level, but at least it shows that this channel can still be accounted for. Once everyone enters, this number will definitely go down.
But you have to distinguish clearly: being recommended does not equal being clicked, and being clicked does not equal a transaction. A product appearing in an answer does not mean the user will click the product card. Even if they click, if the product detail page can’t承接 convert well, they still may not place an order. So when looking at results, look at at least four layers: whether AI can find you, why it chooses you, why users buy, and how good the quality of this transaction is. If you only look at the first layer, it’s very easy to feel good about yourself while actually not getting a single order.
In the future, it will still come down to content
At this stage, getting the sources right and the copy on the right track is enough. But in the future, content requirements will definitely be higher, and ultimately it will still come down to content.
So don’t be fooled by GEO companies. GEO is not mysterious; it’s just the content distribution platforms of the past—even less than the content your own self-media editor writes.
Truly formidable GEO should be a strategy expert plus a copywriting expert. It must be able to combine your industry market and your own development situation to formulate a playbook consistent with the current reality. This is like a branding playbook: first educate the market, then build trust, then seed products, build word-of-mouth, and ultimately return to market thinking.
The moderator’s summary is just one sentence: GEO is low-level technology plus high-level thinking; only then can you play it well. Most GEO companies on the market now are low-level technology plus pure SEO thinking. They have no playbook at all and no awareness of brand and performance.
Watching the backend data and running it yourself is better than handing it over to them. |